Lesson: The Contenders for the English Throne (1066)
Year: 7 | Subject: History | Time Allocation: 100%
Class/Set: ____________ Date/Term: ____________
LO (WALT): To explain and compare the rival claims to the English throne following the death of Edward the Confessor.
Success Criteria (WILF):
- I can identify the three main claimants and their backgrounds.
- I can explain the basis of each claim (e.g., bloodline, promise, or force).
- I can use the PEE (Point, Evidence, Explanation) structure to evaluate which claimant had the strongest legal right to the crown.
1. Starter (15%)
- Display: A physical image of an empty throne and the date '5th January 1066'.
- Recall: Ask students to identify who has just died (Edward the Confessor) and what the immediate problem is for England (no direct heir/successor).
- Brainstorm: List the qualities a successful medieval King would need on mini-whiteboards.
- Bridge: Introduce the term 'Succession Crisis' and explain that three powerful men believe the throne belongs to them.
2. Main Activity (70%)
Teacher Input:
- Explain: Outline the concept of the 'Witan' (the King’s council of advisers) and their role in approving a new monarch.
- Contextualise: Provide a brief overview of the three rivals using the 'Claimants Comparison Table' below.
- Model: Demonstrate how to build a PEE paragraph regarding Harold Godwinson’s claim. Point: Harold had the most immediate claim. Evidence: He was the Earl of Wessex and was reportedly promised the throne on Edward's deathbed. Explanation: This made him the preferred choice of the English Witan, who wanted a native leader to protect them from invasion.
| Claimant |
Origin |
Basis of Claim |
Strength |
| H. Godwinson |
English |
Deathbed promise; supported by Witan. |
Strong (Local support) |
| W. of Normandy |
French |
Distant cousin; 1051 promise; Harold's oath. |
Strong (Legalistic) |
| H. Hardrada |
Viking |
Agreement with previous King Harthacnut. |
Weak (Right of conquest) |
Student Task:
- Analyse: Distribute 'Evidence Cards' containing details of the three claims.
- Task A: Complete the 'Claimant Profile' worksheet by categorising evidence into 'Bloodline', 'Promises', or 'Force'.
- Task B: Write one PEE paragraph for each claimant explaining why they felt they deserved the throne.
- Task C (Challenge): Write a concluding paragraph arguing who had the legally strongest claim versus who was most likely to win a war.
- Support: Provide a sentence starter bank for PEE: "One piece of evidence to support William is... This meant that... Consequently..."
3. Plenary (15%)
- Check: 'The Witan's Vote'. Students must stand in one of three corners of the room representing the claimants.
- Justify: Select one student from each corner to provide one 'Evidence' point to justify their choice.
- Consolidate: Summarise that while Godwinson was crowned, the conflicting claims made war inevitable.
4. Resources
- Image of the Bayeux Tapestry (Edward's death scene).
- Claimant Evidence Cards (Godwinson, William, Hardrada).
- PEE Writing Frame.
- 'Claimant Profile' Worksheet.
⚠ TEACHER’S GUIDANCE
💡 Pedagogical Pulse
- Misconception Alert: Students often assume William was the 'rightful' King because he won. Emphasise that in January 1066, Godwinson was the only one legally crowned by the Witan.
- Oracy Tip: Encourage students to use Tier 3 terms such as usurper, succession, and legitimacy during the Plenary debate.
- Differentiation: For SEND students, provide the 'Claimant Profile' with the 'Basis of Claim' already partially filled, requiring them to only match the name to the fact.
🔑 Answer Key & Task Mapping
Task A: Claimant Profile Mapping
- Harold Godwinson: English Earl, Witan support, Brother-in-law to Edward.
- William of Normandy: Duke of Normandy, Edward’s cousin, 1051 promise, Harold’s sacred oath (1064).
- Harald Hardrada: King of Norway, Viking warrior, 1038 agreement via Harthacnut.
Task B Answer: PEE Model (William of Normandy)
- Point: William of Normandy believed he was the rightful heir due to a long-standing promise.
- Evidence: He claimed Edward promised him the throne in 1051 as thanks for previous support. Furthermore, he claimed Harold Godwinson swore a sacred oath on holy relics to support his claim in 1064.
- Explanation: To a medieval mind, breaking an oath on holy relics was a sin against God, which gave William a strong moral and religious justification to invade and 'punish' Harold.
Task C Answer: Legal vs. Practical Strength
- Legally Strongest: William of Normandy (due to blood ties and the 1051 promise).
- Practically Strongest: Harold Godwinson (due to being present in London and having the Witan's immediate backing).
- Force-based Claim: Harald Hardrada (primarily based on the Viking tradition of taking land by might).
📋 MCQ Knowledge Check
1. Who was the council of nobles that advised the King?
- a) ☐ The Cabinet
- b) ☐ The Witan
- c) ☐ The Parliament
- d) ☐ The Regency
2. What was Harold Godwinson's title before becoming King?
- a) ☐ Duke of Normandy
- b) ☐ King of Norway
- c) ☐ Earl of Wessex
- d) ☐ Bishop of Durham